Neumann–Neumann methods

In mathematics, Neumann–Neumann methods are domain decomposition preconditioners named so because they solve a Neumann problem on each subdomain on both sides of the interface between the subdomains.[1] Just like all domain decomposition methods, so that the number of iterations does not grow with the number of subdomains, Neumann–Neumann methods require the solution of a coarse problem to provide global communication. The balancing domain decomposition is a Neumann–Neumann method with a special kind of coarse problem.

More specifically, consider a domain Ω, on which we wish to solve the Poisson equation

Δ u = f , u | Ω = 0 {\displaystyle -\Delta u=f,\qquad u|_{\partial \Omega }=0}

for some function f. Split the domain into two non-overlapping subdomains Ω1 and Ω2 with common boundary Γ and let u1 and u2 be the values of u in each subdomain. At the interface between the two subdomains, the two solutions must satisfy the matching conditions

u 1 = u 2 , n 1 u 1 = n 2 u 2 {\displaystyle u_{1}=u_{2},\qquad \partial _{n_{1}}u_{1}=\partial _{n_{2}}u_{2}}

where n i {\textstyle n_{i}} is the unit normal vector to Γ in each subdomain.

An iterative method with iterations k=0,1,... for the approximation of each ui (i=1,2) that satisfies the matching conditions is to first solve the Dirichlet problems

Δ u i ( k ) = f i in Ω i , u i ( k ) | Ω = 0 , u i ( k ) | Γ = λ ( k ) {\displaystyle -\Delta u_{i}^{(k)}=f_{i}\;{\text{in}}\;\Omega _{i},\qquad u_{i}^{(k)}|_{\partial \Omega }=0,\quad u_{i}^{(k)}|_{\Gamma }=\lambda ^{(k)}}

for some function λ(k) on Γ, where λ(0) is any inexpensive initial guess. We then solve the two Neumann problems

Δ ψ i ( k ) = 0 in Ω i , ψ i ( k ) | Ω = 0 , n i ψ i ( k ) | Γ = ω ( n 1 u 1 ( k ) + n 2 u 2 ( k ) ) . {\displaystyle -\Delta \psi _{i}^{(k)}=0\;{\text{in}}\;\Omega _{i},\qquad \psi _{i}^{(k)}|_{\partial \Omega }=0,\quad \partial _{n_{i}}\psi _{i}^{(k)}|_{\Gamma }=\omega (\partial _{n_{1}}u_{1}^{(k)}+\partial _{n_{2}}u_{2}^{(k)}).}

We then obtain the next iterate by setting

λ ( k + 1 ) = λ ( k ) ω ( θ 1 ψ 1 ( k ) + θ 2 ψ 2 ( k ) ) on Γ {\displaystyle \lambda ^{(k+1)}=\lambda ^{(k)}-\omega (\theta _{1}\psi _{1}^{(k)}+\theta _{2}\psi _{2}^{(k)})\;{\text{on}}\;\Gamma }

for some parameters ω, θ1 and θ2.

This procedure can be viewed as a Richardson iteration for the iterative solution of the equations arising from the Schur complement method.[2]

This continuous iteration can be discretized by the finite element method and then solved—in parallel—on a computer. The extension to more subdomains is straightforward, but using this method as stated as a preconditioner for the Schur complement system is not scalable with the number of subdomains; hence the need for a global coarse solve.

See also

References

  1. ^ A. Klawonn and O. B. Widlund, FETI and Neumann–Neumann iterative substructuring methods: connections and new results, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 54 (2001), pp. 57–90.
  2. ^ A. Quarteroni and A. Valli, Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Oxford Science Publications 1999.
  • v
  • t
  • e
Finite difference
Parabolic
Hyperbolic
Others
Finite volumeFinite elementMeshless/MeshfreeDomain decompositionOthers